In terms of my actual experience in hospital, I'm a little torn on how things went. My patient experiences were amazing, but I unfortunately found myself struggling every day to make sure they were taken care of at the standard of care that I felt they deserved. Since I don't want to say too much on such a public forum, I'll limit my comments to the fact that I think it's unfortunate that our system is so focused on the short-term rather than the long-term goals of the patients.
Although there were several examples of this during my time in London, one case comes particularly to mind, mainly because I fought so hard to have my patient stay in hospital. This lady came in because she had a one day history of fainting episodes. On examination and on checking her labs, it became quite clear that she was dehydrated and also had acute renal failure.
Looking further into her history, it became apparent there was more to her story than this one visit; over the last four months, she had been in hospital more often than she had stayed at home because of heart attacks, bowel surgery, and just a general sense that she was not coping well. She had in fact lost 50 pounds over this time period, and I was quite concerned. We could easily hydrate her with IV fluids and send her back home; but chances are, if we did that, she would be back again.
I had quite an argument with my team about this; my senior said that everything had been done in the past to find out the reason for her weight loss (and accompanying nausea), and there was no need to keep her in any longer than necessary. On the other hand, I was arguing that something had to be done given that we hadn't fixed the problem, just the effect of it all.
In the end, there was a compromise: my patient ended up staying in hospital longer than intended because her family 'refused' to take her back (that's a trick I learned, btw. If you think your family member should get further investigated, but the team wants to boot him/her, refuse to take them back, and then it'll buy that person some more time in hospital). We're going to try and get her into a clinic to get some further investigations and stabilize her with a feeding tube for now. However, I have a feeling that now that I'm not around, she'll be discharged pretty quickly from hospital, but at least I feel better about her situation.
The patient herself was also quite appreciative towards me, and she told me that if I'm ever back in London, to give her a call, and she'll have me over for dinner with her family.
This elective has actually made me realize that patients are quite astute when you're trying to look out for their best interests. There were many times over these past two weeks where I've had to argue for certain things to be done for my patients; and by the time I finished on Friday and said bye to them, I was surprised how many of them thanked me for what I had done. It's nice to know that I actually made an impression on some of these people!
In summary:
- London is a small city and very similar to Edmonton; which is fine, considering all I'd probably do is see the occasional movie, go to the comic book store, and go out to eat once in a while
- My actual experience was mixed. I had several frustrations with the system, but in the end, I think it was worth it because of the meaningful patient encounters that I had
- One patient that particularly sticks in my mind is one who had come to hospital on numerous occasions because of her medical issues and significant weight loss. I had to fight for her to stay in hospital a bit longer to get further investigations; and I have a feeling that now I'm gone, she'll be discharged soon. But at least I bought her some time to get a bit more testing, and she was quite appreciative of my efforts.
- Back to Edmonton I go now that this elective is at an end!